Logo DOAB
  • Search
  • Publisher login
    • Support
    • Language 
      • English
      • français
    • Deposit
    • For Researchers
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • Our Supporters
    • Resources
    • DOAB
    • For Researchers
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • Our Supporters
    • Resources
    • DOAB
    View Item 
    •   DOAB Home
    • View Item
    •   DOAB Home
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Agency, contingency and census process: Observations of the 2006 Indigenous Enumeration Strategy in remote Aboriginal Australia

    Thumbnail
    Book License
    Download Url(s)
    https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33826/1/458796.pdf
    ---
    https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33826/1/458796.pdf
    ---
    https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33826/1/458796.pdf
    Author(s)
    Morphy, Frances
    Language
    English
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Indigenous Enumeration Strategy (IES) of the Australian National Census of Population and Housing has evolved over the years in response to the perceived ‘difference’ of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. Its defining characteristics are the use of locally recruited, mostly Indigenous collector interviewers, and the administration of a modified collection instrument in discrete Indigenous communities, mostly in remote Australia. The research reported here is unique. The authors, with the assistance of the Australian Bureau of Statistics, were able to follow the workings of the IES in the 2006 Census from the design of the collection instrument to the training of temporary census field staff at the Northern Territory’s Census Management Unit in Darwin, to the enumeration in four remote locations, through to the processing stage at the Data Processing Centre in Melbourne. This allowed the tracking of data from collection to processing, and an assessment of the effects of information flows on the quality of the data, both as input and output. This study of the enumeration involved four very different locations: a group of small outstation communities (Arnhem Land), a large Aboriginal township (Wadeye), an ‘open’ town with a majority Aboriginal population (Fitzroy Crossing), and the minority Aboriginal population of a major regional centre (Alice Springs). A comparison between these contexts reveals differences that reflect the diversity of remote Aboriginal Australia, but also commonalities that exert a powerful influence on the effectiveness of the IES, in particular very high levels of short-term mobility. The selection of sites also allowed a comparison between the enumeration process in the Northern Territory, where a time-extended rolling count was explicitly planned for, and Western Australia, where a modified form of the standard count had been envisaged. The findings suggest that the IES has reached a point in its development where the injection of ever-increasing resources into essentially the same generic set and structure of activities may be producing diminishing returns. There is a need for a new kind of engagement between the Australian Bureau of Statistics and local government and Indigenous community-sector organisations in remote Australia. The agency and local knowledge of Indigenous people could be harnessed more effectively through an ongoing relationship with such organisations, to better address the complex contingencies confronting the census process in remote Indigenous Australia.
    URI
    https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/32358
    Keywords
    population; statistics; aboriginal australians; Census; Chief financial officer; Community Development Employment Projects; Darwin; Northern Territory; Fitzroy Crossing; Western Australia; Indigenous Australians; Northern Territory; Wadeye; Northern Territory; Yolngu
    DOI
    10.26530/OAPEN_458796
    Publisher
    ANU Press
    Publisher website
    http://press.anu.edu.au
    Publication date and place
    Canberra, 2007
    Series
    CAEPR Monograph,
    Classification
    Sociology & anthropology
    Rights
    http://press.anu.edu.au/about/conditions-use
    • OAPEN harvesting collection

    Browse

    All of DOABSubjectsPublishersLanguagesCollections

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Export

    Repository metadata
    Doabooks

    • For Researchers
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • Our Supporters
    • Resources
    • DOAB

    Newsletter


    • subscribe to our newsletter
    • view our news archive

    Follow us on

    • Twitter

    donate


    • Donate
      Support DOAB and the OAPEN Library

    Credits


    • logo ScossScoss
    • logo Investir l'avenirInvestir l'avenir
    • logo MESRIMESRI
    • logo EUEuropean Union
      This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 871069.

    Directory of Open Access Books is a joint service of OAPEN, OpenEdition, CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, provided by DOAB Foundation.

    Websites:

    DOAB
    www.doabooks.org

    OAPEN Home
    www.oapen.org

    OAPEN OA Books Toolkit
    www.oabooks-toolkit.org

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Differen formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    A logged-in user can export up to 15000 items. If you're not logged in, you can export no more than 500 items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.