Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.editorOrtega Del Cerro, Pablo
dc.contributor.editorIrigoyen López, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-13T11:08:11Z
dc.date.available2025-03-13T11:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierONIX_20250313_9788409166060_8
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/157012
dc.languageSpanish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFamilia, Élite de Poder, Historia Social
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTB Social and cultural history
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBS Social groups, communities and identities::JBSF Gender studies, gender groups
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1D Europe::1DS Southern Europe::1DSE Spain
dc.subject.otherHISTORY.History of medieval and modern Spain
dc.subject.otherHISTORY.History of Contemporary Spain S. XX and XXI
dc.subject.otherHISTORY.History of Contemporary Spain S. XIX
dc.titleProfesiones, ciclos vitales y trayectorias familiares entre la continuidad y la transformación (siglos XVII-XX)
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageToday it is practically impossible not to recognize that we are living a time of change; A period of deep transformations, often disconcerting, which are not subject to regular or predictable parameters. But the story is full of similar moments of change, which constitute an object of undoubted interest, although they contain enormous difficulties of research and explanation. Possibly, one of the main problems is to answer the question What are the changes? And from here a whole loop of questions arises: how can they be defined?How do you articulate and develop?How do they transcur over time? For a long time, this problem was dominated by the static-change dilemma, being considered the latter as anomaly, such as irregularity to a becoming that was raised and thought in fixed terms. Mutations were the exception to the stability of a social, political and economic order of essentially invariable characteristics. But is the change the anomaly against the static-structure or is the static irregularity against change? This rhetoric question helps us to recognize that for years it has been developed an approach, called "relational", which can be interesting. This perspective does not understand change as a dichotomous fact, as opposed to static, as if both issues were two forces in struggle, but two sides of the same reality that are feedback dialogue, define themselves in relation to each other.
oapen.identifier.doi10.6018/editum.2801
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy63da4709-56a8-40c6-8a59-6de94b8b23be
oapen.relation.isFundedBy54da4024-af16-4cc5-85d7-4d38d326985c
oapen.relation.isbn9788409166060
oapen.series.number20
oapen.pages406
oapen.place.publicationMurcia
oapen.grant.numberHAR 2017-84226-C6-1-P
oapen.grant.acronymHAR


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/