Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPeeters, Anco
dc.contributor.authorCosentino, Erica
dc.contributor.authorWerning, Markus
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T06:23:24Z
dc.date.available2023-03-03T06:23:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-02-06T10:46:03Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/61172
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/97907
dc.description.abstractMemory perspectives on past events allegedly take one of two shapes. In field memories, we recall episodes from a first-person point of view, while in observer memories, we look at a past scene from a third-person perspective. But this mere visuospatial dichotomy faces several practical and conceptual challenges. First, this binary distinction is not exhaustive. Second, this characterization insufficiently accounts for the phenomenology of observer memories. Third, the focus on the visual aspect of memory perspective neglects emotional, agential, and self-related social aspects. Fourth, the focus on the time of recall neglects the fact that visual, emotional, agential, and social aspects of perspective can also be dissociated in the original experience. In this chapter, we move away from the standard visual dichotomy. Instead, we propose that memory perspective is better understood along four lines: visual, agential, emotional, and social. Drawing on empirical research, we argue that these dimensions predict a disposition to recall a past event based on the present situation of the memorizer. This account supports seeing episodic memory as a natural kind, supported by scenario construction mechanisms and minimal memory traces. By remapping the classic distinction between field and observer perspectives along four dimensions, our proposal provides explanatory advantages and secures practical gains by enabling testable hypotheses.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTM Philosophy of minden_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTK Philosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherAnja Berninger, Íngrid Vendrell Ferran, Peter Langland-Hassan, Markus Werning, Kourken Michaelian, Kengo Miyazono, Uku Tooming, Christopher Jude McCarroll,Alma Barner, Julia Jansen, Fabrice
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTM Philosophy of mind
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTK Philosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledge
dc.titleChapter 8 Constructing a Wider View on Memory
dc.title.alternativeBeyond the Dichotomy of Field and Observer Perspectives
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003153429-11
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookPhilosophical Perspectives on Memory and Imagination
oapen.relation.isFundedByRadboud Universiteit
oapen.relation.isFundedByf8086bb3-4491-4846-8538-b72c95d76c0d
oapen.relation.isbn9780367708771
oapen.relation.isbn9780367720964
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages27
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.relationisFundedByf8086bb3-4491-4846-8538-b72c95d76c0d
peerreview.titleProposal review


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access