Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHinterberger, Kevin Fredy
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-02T09:12:47Z
dc.date.available2023-02-02T09:12:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/96568
dc.description.abstract‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSchriften zum Migrationsrechten_US
dc.subject.classificationLBBR, 1QFE, LNAD3en_US
dc.subject.otherAbschiebung, Asylrecht, Aufenthaltsstatus, Comparative Legal Analysis, Duldung, Einbürgerung, EU Law, EU-Rückführungspolitik, Illegale Migration, Immigration Law, Irregular Immigration, Irregularly Staying Migrants, Migrationspolitik, Migrationsrecht, Migrationssteuerung, Public Law, Rechtsvergleich Regularisations, Return Directive, Rückführungsrichtlinie, Grundrechte, Menschenrechte, Irregulär aufhältige MigrantInnen, Regularisierungen, Aufenthaltsrecht, Vollzugsdefizit, Administrative Law, Migration Law, Deportation, Toleration, Illegal Migration, Irregular Migration, Residence Law, Comparative Law, Fundamental Rights, Human Rights, Return Gap, Return Deficiten_US
dc.titleRegularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EUen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Comparative Legal Analysis of Austria, Germany and Spainen_US
dc.typebook
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
oapen.abstract.otherlanguage‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level.en_US
oapen.identifier.doi10.5771/9783748912798en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy20c8b06d-3b2b-4af2-acda-fbcfdfea5744
oapen.relation.isbn978-3-7489-1279-8en_US
oapen.series.numberBand 43en_US
oapen.pages398en_US
oapen.place.publicationBaden-Badenen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/