Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorOlafson, Frederick
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T15:14:46Z
dc.date.available2022-07-15T15:14:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierONIX_20220715_9781421430096_577
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88830
dc.description.abstractOriginally published in 1967. Many critics have claimed that existentialism has not produced any ethics, as distinct from the moralistic assertions of its individual proponents. Challenging this view, Professor Olafson demonstrates that Sartre, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty indeed worked out a powerful ethical theory and that their positions must be understood as deriving from a voluntarist concept of moral autonomy that can be traced beyond Nietzsche and Kant to certain tendencies in late-medieval thought. He demonstrates that a broad parallelism exists between developments in ethical theory among Continental philosophers of the phenomenological persuasion and the more analytically inclined philosophers of the English-speaking world.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy::HPQ Ethics & moral philosophy
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTQ Ethics and moral philosophyen_US
dc.subject.otherEthics & moral philosophy
dc.titlePrinciples and Persons
dc.title.alternativeAn Ethical Interpretation of Existentialism
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1353/book.67853
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy1f9b1002-ec35-4fcf-94be-32cfd0a1dfd3
oapen.relation.isbn9781421430096
oapen.pages278


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/