Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorBunz, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorVrikki, Photini
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-09T04:08:18Z
dc.date.available2022-07-09T04:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-07-08T13:37:25Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57277
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/87655
dc.description.abstractDatasets have come to play a significant role in the technical and political realities of our overdeveloped world. This chapter indicates how invisible data processes pose a threat to the health and safety of the global public and argues for the democratic potential of data practices. This potential is set to become even more influential due to the central role data plays for training contemporary AI and technologies such as machine learning. Our case study explores the role patient datasets have for machine learning research in healthcare and shows that publicly available datasets are central to advancing data analysis research; they can act as a counterbalance to datasets full of absences, biases, and disconnects that often corrupt the quality of data. Given this, we argue for the introduction of ‘data solidarity’ as a principle of data governance and an effective critical data practice that focuses on the democratic (instead of economic) potential of data; a potential that is far too often overlooked.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othercritical data practice, data as a public good, data solidarity, democratic data, data governance
dc.titleChapter 3 From Big to Democratic Data
dc.title.alternativeWhy the Rise of AI Needs Data Solidarity
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003173427-3
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookDemocratic Frontiers
oapen.relation.isFundedByWellcome Trust
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages17
oapen.grant.number213552/Z/18/Z
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.relationisFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
peerreview.titleProposal review


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access