Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLigthart, Sjors
dc.contributor.authorMeynen, Gerben
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Douglas
dc.description.abstractThe outline of this chapter is as follows. In section 2 we provide a further definition of PTs, and present some possibilities that PTs offer for the smart correctional rehabilitation of criminal offenders. Next, in section 3, we briefly discuss the right to mental liberty and the extent to which this right is guaranteed by existing European human rights. In section 4, we discuss three considerations that should be relevant in specifying human rights protection against smart rehabilitation. Subsequently, in section 5 we explore whether the use of PTs in the context of smart rehabilitation would infringe an appropriately specified legal right to mental liberty. We suggest that, in this context, it might be difficult to identify compelling distinctions between novel forms of smart rehabilitation and more traditional criminal legal interventions, such as the imposition of a prison sentence or a psychological treatment program.
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JK Social services & welfare, criminology::JKV Crime & criminology::JKVQ Offenders::JKVQ1 Rehabilitation of offenders
dc.subject.otherpersuasive technologies; mental liberty; rehabilitation; criminal offenders
dc.titleChapter 3 Persuasive technologies and the right to mental liberty
dc.title.alternativeThe ‘smart’ rehabilitation of criminal offenders
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookThe Cambridge Handbook of Information Technology, Life Sciences and Human Rights
oapen.collectionEuropean Research Council (ERC)
dc.grantprojectProtecting Minds

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access