Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTottossy, Beatrice
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-02T04:34:53Z
dc.date.available2022-06-02T04:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2022-05-31T10:18:55Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220531_9788866553113_286
dc.identifier2420-8361
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55002
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83620
dc.description.abstractThe 2002 Nobel Prize to Imre Kertész is a symptom: Hungary is now weltliterarisch. The historical process – which has seen Hungarian writers working since the 1970s to gain ontological autonomy for their field, to write in a language that is not mendacious, to go beyond the 'modern' of real socialism to a 'postmodern' in which reality is not "described", but "employed", and to anthropic ends – is at a standstill, it is greeted abroad as a common heritage. According to Ungheria 1945-2002. La dimensione letteraria – which concludes a prolonged period of analytical work (see Scrivere postmoderno in Ungheria, 1995, and Scrittori ungheresi allo specchio, 2003) – the Hungarian contribution to the contemporary era lies in its sense for this anthropic function of literature (even though the context now seems to want to thwart this effort).
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticismen_US
dc.titleUngheria 1945-2002. La dimensione letteraria
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6655-311-3
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788866553113
oapen.relation.isbn9788892737310
oapen.pages221
oapen.place.publicationFirenze
dc.seriesnumber15
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe 2002 Nobel Prize to Imre Kertész is a symptom: Hungary is now weltliterarisch. The historical process – which has seen Hungarian writers working since the 1970s to gain ontological autonomy for their field, to write in a language that is not mendacious, to go beyond the 'modern' of real socialism to a 'postmodern' in which reality is not "described", but "employed", and to anthropic ends – is at a standstill, it is greeted abroad as a common heritage. According to Ungheria 1945-2002. La dimensione letteraria – which concludes a prolonged period of analytical work (see Scrivere postmoderno in Ungheria, 1995, and Scrittori ungheresi allo specchio, 2003) – the Hungarian contribution to the contemporary era lies in its sense for this anthropic function of literature (even though the context now seems to want to thwart this effort).


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access