Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArchangeli, Diana
dc.contributor.authorPulleyblank, Douglas
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T15:49:08Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T15:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-04-22T05:31:00Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54088
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/81414
dc.description.abstractTo what extent do complex phonological patterns require the postulation of universal mechanisms specific to language? In this volume, we explore the Emergent Hypothesis, that the innate language-specific faculty driving the shape of adult grammars is minimal, with grammar development relying instead on cognitive capacities of a general nature. Generalisations about sounds, and about the way sounds are organised into meaningful units, are constructed in a bottom-up fashion: As such, phonology is emergent. We present arguments for considering the Emergent Hypothesis, both conceptually and by working through an extended example in order to demonstrate how an adult grammar might emerge from the input encountered by a learner. Developing a concrete, data-driven approach, we argue that the conventional, abstract notion of unique underlying representations is unmotivated; such underlying representations would require some innate principle to ensure their postulation by a learner. We review the history of the concept and show that such postulated forms result in undesirable phonological consequences. We work through several case studies to illustrate how various types of phonological patterns might be accounted for in the proposed framework. The case studies illustrate patterns of allophony, of productive and unproductive patterns of alternation, and cases where the surface manifestation of a feature does not seem to correspond to its morphological source. We consider cases where a phonetic distinction that is binary seems to manifest itself in a way that is morphologically ternary, and we consider cases where underlying representations of considerable abstractness have been posited in previous frameworks. We also consider cases of opacity, where observed phonological properties do not neatly map onto the phonological generalisations governing patterns of alternation.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::C Language::CF linguistics
dc.subject.otherLanguage Arts & Disciplines
dc.subject.otherLinguistics
dc.titleEmergent phonology (Volume 7)
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5721159
oapen.relation.isPublishedByed03121b-b998-4b50-8d58-1d0745565558
oapen.relation.isFundedByKnowledge Unlatched
oapen.relation.isbn9783961103355
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.imprintLanguage Science Press
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access