Show simple item record

Désir de multitude. Différence, antagonisme et politique matérialiste

dc.contributor.authorAragüés Estragués, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.otherCanavera, Julien
dc.contributor.otherFerrero, Corinne
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T09:53:23Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T09:53:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierONIX_20220425_2353111378_7
dc.identifier.issn2823-975X
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/80912
dc.languageFrench
dc.languageSpanish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDissidences / Disidenci@s
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy::HPS Social & political philosophy
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophyen_US
dc.subject.otherpolitics
dc.subject.othersubject
dc.subject.otherdifference
dc.subject.otherantagonism
dc.subject.othermaterialism
dc.subject.othermultitude
dc.subject.otherpeople
dc.subject.otherclass
dc.subject.otherpopulism
dc.subject.otherparty
dc.subject.otherdesire
dc.subject.otheraffects
dc.subject.othermarxism
dc.subject.othertranslation
dc.subject.otherlistening
dc.subject.otherepistemology
dc.subject.otheranthropology
dc.subject.otherontology
dc.subject.othersophistry
dc.titleDésir de multitude. Différence, antagonisme et politique matérialiste
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageHow can we develop a politics of difference with an antagonistic and materialist vocation? This is the big question that runs through this book. It is a question that, for the author, cannot be avoided by an ontological, anthropological and epistemological questioning, and which requires, above all, a relentless critique of the dominant philosophical line of Western thought. For one of the main obstacles to the implementation of an antagonistic policy could well be the persistence, in our modes of thought and organisation, of an idealistic conceptual arsenal that is incompatible with a materialist approach to reality. Idealism, from its Platonic origins, has thus constantly sought to erase the traces of difference that run through reality, and to ignore, or stifle, any discourse aimed at apprehending reality under the prism of the most radical immanence. However, there is a powerful materialist tradition, subterranean in its Milsian origins, which develops particularly from the writings of Spinoza, Marx and Nietzsche, opening the way to an important line of thought on the politics of difference of which Deleuze, Negri, or the Invisible Committee were, and still are, the main representatives. A line of thought that allows us to question in a new way the essentialist anchoring of entire sections of twentieth-century critical thought, in order to finally make difference the starting point of a materialist politics that, as Deleuze wrote, "is capable of changing everything".
oapen.identifier.doi10.46608/dissidences1.9782353111374
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy289b528b-6dd2-4827-96c6-c261ff6f9e48
oapen.relation.isPublishedBye7e9fc49-1df6-4388-b470-1947f513e4ab
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy76fc7177-77e2-4250-babf-33a8364c1ba6
oapen.relation.isbn2353111378
oapen.relation.isbn235311136X
oapen.relation.isbn2353111386
oapen.imprintPôle Production Imprimé, Université Bordeaux Montaigne
oapen.series.number1
oapen.pages134
oapen.place.publicationPessac


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/