Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGartmann, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-16T04:02:22Z
dc.date.available2021-12-16T04:02:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-12-15T09:22:47Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/52023
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/74983
dc.description.abstractThe idea of improvisation, broadly defined, has been integral to our imagination of the medieval musical past. It can be related to many elements of production: to the act of un-notated creation; to the manipulation and amplification of notated materials; to our observance of rigid rules and formulae; or to spontaneous freedom. Likely a product of the Carolingian Renaissance, this is the first medieval music treatise to address an aspect of chant performance that does not only relate to a memorized repertoire, but includes an unwritten practice of extemporizing an accompanying voice to a pre-given melody. The art of “coloration” or the ornamentation of a line, whether polyphonic or monophonic, had been an integral part of extemporization since at least the time of the Ad organum faciendum treatises. When planning author's ontological inquiries, the author's would do well to remember the possible existence of creativity that is not inspired, or ephemerality that is not performer- or expression-centered.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy, Ontology, Music, Improvisation, Arts, Performance
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy
dc.titleChapter 27 Repeatability versus Unrepeatability in Free Improvisation
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003179443-31
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Improvisation in the Arts
oapen.relation.isbn9780367203641
oapen.relation.isbn9781032016498
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages14
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.titleProposal review


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access