Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorvon der Becke, Tanja
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T15:25:50Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T15:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierONIX_20210520_9783110726268_39
dc.identifier.issn1612-8702
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69862
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLinguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherArgument omission
dc.subject.otherpolysemy
dc.subject.otherverb valency
dc.titleSemantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie
dc.title.alternativeInterpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageTransitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb.
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110726268
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726268
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726374
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726831
oapen.series.number91
oapen.pages366


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/