The Best of Technology Writing 2008
| dc.contributor.author | Clive Thompson, Editor | * |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-11T08:58:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-11T08:58:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | * |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-04-06 14:29:55 | * |
| dc.identifier | 14511 | * |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41978 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Best of Technology Writing 2008 proves that technology writing is a bona fide literary genre with some of the most stylish, compelling, and just plain readable work in journalism today. The third volume in this annual series, The Best of Technology Writing 2008 covers a fascinating mix of topics—from a molecular gastronomist's recipe for the perfect gin and tonic; to ""the Mechanism,"" an ancient Greek artifact that might be the world's first laptop computer; to social media, privacy, and what is possibly the biggest generation gap since rock 'n' roll. | * |
| dc.language | English | * |
| dc.subject | T1-995 | * |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::T Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Industrial processes::TB Technology: general issues | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Technical writing | * |
| dc.title | The Best of Technology Writing 2008 | * |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | b7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17 | * |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472033270 | * |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. | en_US |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. | |
| oapen.peerreview | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| oapen.peerreview | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described
as
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/