Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScambary, Benedict
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T12:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-11-20 00:00:00
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T14:50:14Z
dc.identifier459939
dc.identifierOCN: 1030815465
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/33543
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34592
dc.description.abstractAgreements between the mining industry and Indigenous people are not creating sustainable economic futures for Indigenous people, and this demands consideration of alternate forms of economic engagement in order to realise such ‘futures’. Within the context of three mining agreements in north Australia this study considers Indigenous livelihood aspirations and their intersection with sustainable development agendas. The three agreements are the Yandi Land Use Agreement in the Central Pilbara in Western Australia, the Ranger Uranium Mine Agreement in the Kakadu region of the Northern Territory, and the Gulf Communities Agreement in relation to the Century zinc mine in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria in Queensland. Recent shifts in Indigenous policy in Australia seek to de-emphasise the cultural behaviour or imperatives of Indigenous people in undertaking economic action, in favour of a mainstream conventional approach to economic development. Concepts of ‘value’, ‘identity’, and ‘community’ are key elements in the tension between culture and economics that exists in the Indigenous policy environment. Whilst significant diversity exists within the Indigenous polity, Indigenous aspirations for the future typically emphasise a desire for alternate forms of economic engagement that combine elements of the mainstream economy with the maintenance and enhancement of Indigenous institutions and ‘livelihood’ activities. Such aspirations reflect ongoing and dynamic responses to modernity, and typically concern the interrelated issues of access to and management of ‘country’, the maintenance of Indigenous institutions associated with family and kin, access to resources such as cash and vehicles, the establishment of robust representative organisations, and are integrally linked to the derivation of both symbolic and economic value of livelihood pursuits.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAEPR Monograph
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherindigenous studies
dc.subject.othermining
dc.subject.otherNorthern Territory
dc.subject.otherPilbara
dc.subject.otherWaanyi
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBS Social groups, communities and identities::JBSL Ethnic studies::JBSL1 Ethnic groups and multicultural studies::JBSL11 Indigenous peoples
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::5 Interest qualifiers::5P Relating to specific groups and cultures or social and cultural interests::5PB Relating to peoples: ethnic groups, indigenous peoples, cultures and other groupings of people::5PBA Relating to Indigenous peoples
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNC Company, commercial and competition law: general::LNCR Energy and natural resources law
dc.titleMy Country, Mine Country: Indigenous people, mining and development contestation in remote Australia (CAEPR Monograph 33)
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.26530/OAPEN_459939
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy975ba519-3ce2-4517-95bf-b847729fbcf1
oapen.place.publicationCanberra
dc.seriesnumber33


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record