Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYang, Shuhui
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T14:12:21Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T14:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierONIX_20200903_9780472901517_8
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41563
dc.identifier47068*
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33912
dc.description.abstractFeng Menglong (1574–1646) was recognized as the most knowledgeable connoisseur of popular literature of his time. He is known today for compiling three famous collections of vernacular short stories, each containing forty stories, collectively known as Sanyan. Appropriation and Representation adapts concepts of ventriloquism and dialogism from Bakhtin and Holquist to explore Feng’s methods of selecting source materials. Shuhui Yang develops a model of development in which Feng’s approach to selecting and working with his source materials becomes clear. More broadly, Appropriation and Representation locates Feng Menglong’s Sanyan in the cultural milieu of the late Ming, including the archaist movement in literature, literati marginality and anxieties, the subversive use of folk works, and the meiren xiangcao tradition—appropriating a female identity to express male frustration. Against this background, a rationale emerges for Feng’s choice to elevate and promote the vernacular story while stepping back form an overt authorial role.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMichigan Monographs In Chinese Studies
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherSociety and social sciences
dc.titleAppropriation and Representation
dc.title.alternativeFeng Menglong and the Chinese Vernacular Story
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.19263
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17
oapen.relation.isFundedBydcf50849-b837-420d-ac46-64995a7bf0d4
oapen.relation.isFundedBy0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a
oapen.imprintU OF M CENTER FOR CHINESE STUDIES
oapen.pages197
oapen.grant.number[grantnumber unknown]
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.en_US
oapen.peerreviewExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
dc.dateSubmitted2020-09-03T13:54:32Z
dc.relationisFundedBy0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a
dc.seriesnumber79


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access