Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDawson, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T12:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2007-07-13
dc.date.submitted2018-04-19 23:55
dc.date.submitted2020-03-12 03:00:31
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T12:49:05Z
dc.identifier648347
dc.identifierOCN: 1227794885
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30231
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33105
dc.description.abstractMongrel Nation surveys the history of the United Kingdom’s African, Asian, and Caribbean populations from 1948 to the present, working at the juncture of cultural studies, literary criticism, and postcolonial theory. Ashley Dawson argues that during the past fifty years Asian and black intellectuals from Sam Selvon to Zadie Smith have continually challenged the United Kingdom’s exclusionary definitions of citizenship, using innovative forms of cultural expression to reconfigure definitions of belonging in the postcolonial age. By examining popular culture and exploring topics such as the nexus of race and gender, the growth of transnational politics, and the clash between first- and second-generation immigrants, Dawson broadens and enlivens the field of postcolonial studies.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherLiterature
dc.subject.otherBlack British people
dc.subject.otherBlack people
dc.subject.otherCaribbean
dc.subject.otherRacism
dc.titleMongrel Nation
dc.title.alternativeDiasporic Culture and the Making of Postcolonial Britain
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.206486
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17
oapen.relation.isFundedByKnowledge Unlatched
oapen.relation.isFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
oapen.relation.isbn9780472025053
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.place.publicationAnn Arbor
oapen.grant.number100928
oapen.grant.programKU Select 2017: Backlist Collection
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.
oapen.peerreviewExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
dc.number100928
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access