Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorLeggio, Daniele Viktor
dc.contributor.authorMatras, Yaron
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T12:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2019-10-17 14:46:24
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T12:17:52Z
dc.date.submitted2018-11-01 23:55
dc.date.submitted2019-10-17 14:46:24
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T12:17:52Z
dc.date.submitted2018-10-01 23:55:55
dc.date.submitted2019-10-17 14:46:24
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T12:17:52Z
dc.identifier1001782
dc.identifierOCN: 1082959125
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28212
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29793
dc.description.abstractIn March 2014, the e-mail list of the European Academic Network on Romani Studies1 hosted a discussion on definitions of the population known as ‘Roma’. It began when one of the subscribers to the list – which at the time brought together some 350 academics who specialised in Romani/Gypsy studies – asked for reactions to two generalisations which she came across while preparing a legal review of a document on cultural rights: (1) that all Roma speak a variety of the same language, Romanes; and (2) that Roma generally consider themselves to be a nation. Some two-dozen scholars posted their reactions, which together offer a fairly exhaustive summary of contemporary views on the subject
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.otherRoma
dc.subject.otherCultures
dc.subject.otherOpen borders
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology
dc.titleChapter 1 How open borders can unlock cultures
dc.title.alternativeConcepts, methods, and procedures
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookOpen Borders, Unlocked Cultures
oapen.relation.isbn9781315295770
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages27
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.titleProposal review


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access