Umay Yayınevi
Türkiye
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-21T07:33:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-21T07:33:06Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/176029 | |
| dc.type | publisher | |
| publisher.contact | Kızıldağ, Feride | |
| publisher.contact | KIZILDAĞ, Hasan | |
| publisher.name | Umay Yayınevi | en_US |
| publisher.email | iletisim@umayyayinevi.com | en_US |
| publisher.address | Yenimahalle Mah. Şehit Polis Yalçın Yamaner Sok. No: 18/21 55270 Samsun/Türkiye | en_US |
| publisher.country | Türkiye | en_US |
| publisher.website | https://umayyayinevi.com | en_US |
| publisher.program | Umay Yayınevi (Umay Publishing House) advocates for the accessibility of information. Publishing both print and digital publications, Umay Publishing House generally prefers the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license model for its open-access books, protecting the author's rights while promoting scientific dissemination. For hybrid or print books, copyright protection is ensured by adhering to open science principles and contractual agreements. | en_US |
| publisher.oabooks.number | 59 | en_US |
| publisher.oabooks.exampleUrl | https://umayyayinevi.com/en/toplumsal-bellek-ve-kulturel-kimlik-acisindan-asiklik-gelenegi-azerbaycan-ornegi-prof-dr-hatire-besirli-ed-prof-dr-fuzuli-bayat/ | en_US |
| publisher.oalicense | CC BY NC Umay Publishing House's website, its content, and everything related to it are protected under a Creative Commons License. Our digital books are protected under the Creative Commons CC BY NC license. | en_US |
| publisher.peerreviewpolicy | Publication Ethics, Academic Publishing and Open Science Policy 1. Institutional Principles and Academic Responsibility Umay Publishing House is an independent academic publishing house committed to international standards in the production, evaluation, and dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The publishing house operates in accordance with the principles of academic integrity, editorial independence, transparency, and sustainability. This policy applies to all print and digital academic publications, including scholarly monographs, edited volumes, translations, and open access works. Our publishing practices are guided by internationally recognized frameworks, including: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) principles of good publishing practice Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) criteria for open access books Scopus content selection and quality evaluation standards 2. Editorial Independence and Peer Review Publication decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, originality, methodological rigor, and contribution to the field. Editorial processes are conducted independently of the author’s institutional affiliation, academic title, nationality, gender, religion, or political views. Scholarly works are subject to expert evaluation. Depending on the nature of the publication, peer review may follow double-blind, single-blind, or editorial board review models. Editors and reviewers: Must declare any conflicts of interest. Are required to maintain confidentiality. Are expected to uphold the principles of academic integrity and objectivity. UMAY PUBLISHING HOUSE PEER REVIEW POLICY Umay Publishing House conducts a rigorous evaluation process to ensure the scientific value, originality, and quality of all academic works it publishes. Our publishing house guarantees impartiality and high academic standards by adopting the “Peer Review” system. 1. Initial Assessment Process All submissions sent to our publishing house are first reviewed by the editorial board according to the following criteria: Compliance with publication principles and scope. Originality and adherence to scientific methodology. Similarity (Plagiarism) report compliance (İntihal.net/iThenticate/Turnitin, etc.). 2. Peer Review Method (Double-Blind Peer Review) Umay Publishing House uses the Double-Blind Peer Review method in its evaluation process. Author information is kept confidential from reviewers, and reviewer information is kept confidential from authors. Each work is sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in their field. In the event of a disagreement among the referees, the opinion of a third referee shall be sought. 3. Evaluation Criteria Referees are responsible for evaluating the work from the following perspectives: The contribution of the study to the literature and its relevance. The accuracy and applicability of the method. The consistency of the findings and the depth of the discussion. Compliance with ethical rules. 4. Referee Reports and Decisions Based on the reports from the referees, the editor makes one of the following decisions: Accept: The work can be published as is. Revision (Minor/Major): The author is asked to revise their work based on the reviewers' suggestions. Reassessment: After major revisions, the work is sent back to the referee for review. Rejection: The study is rejected due to scientific inadequacy or ethical violation. 5. Confidentiality and Ethical Responsibility Confidentality: Referees may not share the works they review with third parties prior to publication, nor may they use the data contained therein for their own benefit. Conflict of Interest: Reviewers should inform the editor and withdraw from the review process if they have any conflict of interest (financial, academic, or personal) with the authors of the work they are evaluating. 6. Right to Disclosure and Objection Authors have the right to file a reasoned objection to scientific errors or allegations of biased evaluation in referee reports. These objections are reviewed by the Editorial Board and a final decision is made. | en_US |
| publisher.authorinstructions.url | https://umayyayinevi.com/en/kitap-basvurusu/ | en_US |
| publisher.status.active | false | |
| publisher.phone | +905433343869 | en_US |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||