Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchnetter, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-27T10:32:35Z
dc.date.available2025-02-27T10:32:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/153309
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSprache und Medialität des Rechts / Language and Media of Law (SMR)
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law
dc.subject.otherLegal rhetoric
dc.subject.otherConstitutional court
dc.subject.otherFundamental rights protection
dc.titleGerichtsrhetorik
dc.title.alternativePersuasion im europäischen Verfassungsgerichtsverbund
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThe author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions.
oapen.identifier.doi10.3790/978-3-428-59203-6
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy65d50a8a-1a1d-48a7-b38f-f049cf105e5c
oapen.relation.isbn9783428592036
oapen.relation.isbn9783428192038
oapen.series.number8
oapen.pages386
oapen.place.publicationBerlin


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/