Gerichtsrhetorik
Persuasion im europäischen Verfassungsgerichtsverbund
| dc.contributor.author | Schnetter, Marcus | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-27T10:32:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-27T10:32:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/153309 | |
| dc.language | German | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Sprache und Medialität des Rechts / Language and Media of Law (SMR) | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law | |
| dc.subject.other | Legal rhetoric | |
| dc.subject.other | Constitutional court | |
| dc.subject.other | Fundamental rights protection | |
| dc.title | Gerichtsrhetorik | |
| dc.title.alternative | Persuasion im europäischen Verfassungsgerichtsverbund | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.abstract.otherlanguage | The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions. | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3790/978-3-428-59203-6 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 65d50a8a-1a1d-48a7-b38f-f049cf105e5c | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783428592036 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783428192038 | |
| oapen.series.number | 8 | |
| oapen.pages | 386 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Berlin |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||

