Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChernykh, Svitlana
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T04:21:41Z
dc.date.available2024-10-31T04:21:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-10-29T10:21:23Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/94116
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/146910
dc.description.abstractOver the past twenty years, the causes and consequences of post-election disputes have become one of the most compelling topics of research in political science. Between 2012 and 2022, political parties challenged the results of more than 25 percent of elections. When democratic transitions are dependent on the willingness of participants to accept defeat, political parties can undermine election-based democracy by rejecting the outcome. As the world enters the fourth decade since the start of the third wave of democratization, the question of whether election losers will comply or reject election outcomes is more and more pressing. The Dilemma of Compliance analyzes this phenomenon at the level of political parties, raising three important questions: Why do some political parties refuse to comply with election results? What determines the strategies they use to contest the outcomes? What consequences do post-election disputes have for the political parties that initiate them? To answer these questions, this book draws on an original dataset of post-election responses encompassing over 300 political parties, which participated in 270 elections held in twenty-two countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union over a period of more than two decades. In doing so, it offers a new theoretical framework for studying electoral compliance in comparative perspective and advances research on democratic transition, democracy promotion, post-election protests, and party politics.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and governmenten_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPH Political structure and processes::JPHF Elections and referenda / suffrageen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPB Comparative politicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherElections, election compliance, electoral rejection, election protests, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, Ukraine, Georgia, political parties, electoral revolutions, election violence, democratization, democratic transition, electoral rules, term limits, electoral law, election disputes, electoral integrity, contested elections, election dispute resolution
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPH Political structure and processes::JPHF Elections and referenda / suffrage
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPB Comparative politics
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
dc.titleThe Dilemma of Compliance
dc.title.alternativePolitical Parties and Post-Election Disputes
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.11976215
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17
oapen.relation.isFundedByKnowledge Unlatched
oapen.relation.isFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
oapen.relation.isbn9780472076086
oapen.relation.isbn9780472056088
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.pages201
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.
oapen.peerreviewExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access