Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorShea, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T04:19:55Z
dc.date.available2024-10-24T04:19:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-10-23T14:17:03Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/93950
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/146433
dc.description.abstractResearch on concepts has concentrated on the way people apply concepts online, when presented with a stimulus. Just as important, however, is the use of concepts offline, when planning what to do or thinking about what is the case. There is strong evidence that inferences driven by conceptual thought draw heavily on special-purpose resources: sensory, motoric, affective, and evaluative. At the same time, concepts afford general-purpose recombination and support domain-general reasoning processes—phenomena that have long been the focus of philosophers. There is a growing consensus that a theory of concepts must encompass both kinds of process. This book shows how concepts are able to act as an interface between general-purpose reasoning and special-purpose systems. Concept-driven thinking can take advantage of the complementary costs and benefits of each. The book lays out an empirically-based account of the different ways in which thinking with concepts takes us to new conclusions and underpins planning, decision-making, and action. It also spells out three useful implications of the account. First, it allows us to reconstruct the commonplace idea that thinking draws on the meaning of a concept. Second, it offers an insight into how human cognition avoids the frame problem and the complementary, less discussed, ‘if-then problem’ for nested processing dispositions. Third, it shows that metacognition can apply to concepts and concept-driven thinking in various ways. The framework developed in the book elucidates what it is that makes concept-driven thinking an especially powerful cognitive resource.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherconcepts, cognition, inference, compositionality, mental interface, mental representation, metacognition, reasoning, models, deliberation
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTM Philosophy of mind
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JM Psychology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::U Computing and Information Technology::UY Computer science::UYQ Artificial intelligence
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFA Philosophy of language
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PD Science: general issues::PDA Philosophy of science
dc.titleConcepts at the Interface
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1093/9780191997167.001.0001
oapen.relation.isPublishedBydb4e319f-ca9f-449a-bcf2-37d7c6f885b1
oapen.relation.isFundedByed8450cd-76f0-407a-ad81-12055ea7c934
oapen.relation.isFundedBy02c39681-1742-423f-aca2-f0fe21e278c5
oapen.pages270
oapen.place.publicationOxford
dc.relationisFundedBy02c39681-1742-423f-aca2-f0fe21e278c5


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access