Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWright, Claire
dc.contributor.authorTomaselli, Alexandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T10:59:56Z
dc.date.available2023-11-16T10:59:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2023-08-28T15:32:43Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/75857
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/121434
dc.description.abstractThis conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book deals with an important conceptual question: how useful is the “implementation gap” as an approach to understanding Indigenous rights? It describes the active participation of Indigenous organisations in multilateral negotiations over the creation of international documents – particularly the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – but their somewhat limited impact on the scope of participation, consultation, and consent in the texts finally adopted by States. The book shows that Environmental Impact Assessments – which should in theory help to protect Indigenous Peoples’ interests – in fact account for many deficiencies in consultations over the extraction of natural resources in Bolivia, given that they fail to identify all impacts and reflect the government’s pro-extraction bias.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherconsultation rights, FPIC, Free, Prior and Informed consent, indigenous, Indigenous communities, Indigenous consultation, indigenous prior consultation, Indigenous rights, Indigenous threats, latin america, prior consultation
dc.titleChapter 18 From the implementation gap to Indigenous empowerment
dc.title.alternativePrior consultation in Latin America
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781351042109-25
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookThe Prior Consultation of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America
oapen.relation.isbn9781138488069
oapen.relation.isbn9780367784379
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages13
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.titleProposal review


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access