Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Sidonie Ann
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-05T10:00:49Z
dc.date.available2023-10-05T10:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierONIX_20231005_9780472900060_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/114224
dc.description.abstractAfter a remarkable career in higher education, Sidonie Smith offers Manifesto for the Humanities as a reflective contribution to the current academic conversation over the place of the Humanities in the 21st century. Her focus is on doctoral education and opportunities she sees for its reform. Grounding this manifesto in background factors contributing to current "crises" in the humanities, Smith advocates for a 21st century doctoral education responsive to the changing ecology of humanistic scholarship and teaching. She elaborates a more expansive conceptualization of coursework and dissertation, a more robust, engaged public humanities, and a more diverse, collaborative, and networked sociality.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDigital Humanities
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JN Education
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JN Education::JNS Teaching of specific groups & persons with special educational needs::JNSV Teaching of students with English as a second language (TESOL)
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Educationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNU Teaching of a specific subjecten_US
dc.subject.otherEducation
dc.titleManifesto for the Humanities
dc.title.alternativeTransforming Doctoral Education in Good Enough Times
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.2307/j.ctv65sw68
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17
oapen.relation.isbn9780472900060
oapen.relation.isbn9780472073047
oapen.imprintDigitalculturebooks
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.
oapen.peerreviewExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/