Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorvan Tuinen, Sjoerd
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T17:04:20Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T17:04:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2023-07-19T08:47:43Z
dc.identifierOCN: 1389887186
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/63996
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/107844
dc.description.abstractDrawing upon a wide variety of authors, approaches, and ideological contexts, this book offers a comprehensive and detailed critique of the distinct and polemical senses in which the concept of ressentiment (and its cognate 'resentment') is used today. It also proposes a new mode of addressing ressentiment in which critique and polemics no longer set the tone: care. Contemporary tendencies in political culture such as neoliberalism, nationalism, populism, identity politics, and large-scale conspiracy theories have led to the return of the concept of ressentiment in armchair political analysis. This book argues that, due to the tension between its enormous descriptive power and its mutually contradicting ideological performances, it is necessary to ‘redramatize’ the concept of ressentiment. By what right do we possess and use the concept of ressentiment, and what makes the phenomenon worth knowing? Inspired by Marxist political epistemology, affect theory, postcolonialism, and feminism, the book maps, delimits, and assesses four irreducible ways in which ressentiment can be articulated: the ways of the priest, the physician, the witness, and the diplomat. The first perspective is typically embodied by conservative (Scheler, Girard) and liberal (Smith, Rawls) political theory; the second, by Nietzsche, Deleuze and Foucault; whereas the standpoint of the witness is found in the writings of Améry, Fanon and Adorno; and the diplomat’s is the author’s own, albeit inspired by philosophers such as Ahmed, Stiegler, Stengers, and Sloterdijk. In producing a dialectical sequence between all four typical modes of enunciation, the book demonstrates how the first three reinterpretations of ressentiment are already implied in the theater set up in Nietzsche’s late polemical books, while the fourth proposes a line of flight out of it. The Dialectic of Ressentiment will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in critical theory, social and political philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, history, literature, political science, anthropology, and Nietzsche scholarship. It will also appeal to anyone interested in the politics of anger, discourse ethics, trauma studies, and memory politics. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800en_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thoughten_US
dc.subject.otheraffect;authenticity;biopolitics;common sense;compositionism;cosmopolitics;critical theory;critiques of neoliberalism;cultural history;democracy;dialectics;envy;feminism;genealogy;good sense;justice;media culture;modernity;phenomenology;polemics;political concepts;political epistemology;populism;postcolonialism;power;psychologization;resentment;ressentiment;right versus fact;Sjoerd van Tuinen
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought
dc.titleThe Dialectic of Ressentiment
dc.title.alternativePedagogy of a Concept
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003384250
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isFundedByErasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
oapen.relation.isFundedBy78685a97-a622-47b3-b5c2-35de8aa1354a
oapen.relation.isbn9781032470214
oapen.relation.isbn9781032470221
oapen.relation.isbn9781003384250
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages323
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.relationisFundedBy78685a97-a622-47b3-b5c2-35de8aa1354a
peerreview.titleProposal review


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access