Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFossati, Fabio
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-23T04:03:30Z
dc.date.available2022-12-23T04:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-12-22T16:05:18Z
dc.identifierONIX_20221222_9788855185950_16
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60354
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/95566
dc.description.abstractCollaboration is an intense cooperation aimed at realizing common objectives; coordination wants to avoid adverse interests. There is anarchy when governments make unilateral decisions. In conflicts actors have incompatible scopes. The World Health Organization implemented some standards to help governments to manage the sanitary emergence. The communication network of health technicians has informally pushed governments to apply those standards. Eastern Asian states were faster in their reactions than Western countries. Coordination worked with the diffusion of informal norms and not of codified and binding regimes of international law. Sweden did not fully apply those standards, but without deep objections and with ad hoc exceptions. Taiwan’s standards were even more efficient than WHO.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherCoordination
dc.subject.otherConflict
dc.subject.otherAnarchy
dc.subject.otherInternational regimes
dc.subject.otherPandemic
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
dc.titleChapter Il coordinamento internazionale in risposta alla pandemia Covid-19
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-595-0.07
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788855185950
oapen.pages11
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber238
dc.abstractotherlanguageCollaboration is an intense cooperation aimed at realizing common objectives; coordination wants to avoid adverse interests. There is anarchy when governments make unilateral decisions. In conflicts actors have incompatible scopes. The World Health Organization implemented some standards to help governments to manage the sanitary emergence. The communication network of health technicians has informally pushed governments to apply those standards. Eastern Asian states were faster in their reactions than Western countries. Coordination worked with the diffusion of informal norms and not of codified and binding regimes of international law. Sweden did not fully apply those standards, but without deep objections and with ad hoc exceptions. Taiwan’s standards were even more efficient than WHO.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access