Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiglio, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-02T04:06:05Z
dc.date.available2022-06-02T04:06:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2022-06-01T12:25:03Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855185103_649
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56464
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/82213
dc.description.abstractThe paper studies the editorial practice of Boccaccio in his copies of Dante’s Vita Nuova, through a textual comparison between the two preserved transcriptions and the ones that are only hypothetically referable to his work, thanks to an examination of the varia lectio. What emerged for Vita Nuova from a new comprehensive collatio of the most important witnesses of Boccaccio’s manuscript tradition, put together with what is known about the other Dante’s works copied by Boccaccio himself (lyrics and Commedia), seem to converge in the hypothesis, already suggested by Michele Barbi, that around the interpositus b3 it is quite recognizable a third “authorial edition”, originally conceived like the other two, and perhaps currently surviving in the manuscript Riccardiano 1035.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherBoccaccio
dc.subject.otherDante
dc.subject.otherVita nuova
dc.subject.othermanuscript tradition
dc.subject.otherautographs
dc.titleChapter Ancora su Boccaccio copista di Dante: (almeno) tre ‘redazioni’ della Vita nuova
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-510-3.03
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788855185103
oapen.pages16
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber236


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access