Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorCaudron, Corentin
dc.contributor.editorChardot, Lauriane
dc.contributor.editorGirona, Társilo
dc.contributor.editorAoki, Yosuke
dc.contributor.editorFournier, Nico
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T16:24:21Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T16:24:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierONIX_20211118_9782889636242_898
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/73766
dc.description.abstractForecasting volcanic eruptions and their potential impacts are primary goals in Natural Hazards research. Active volcanoes are nowadays monitored by different ground and space-based instruments providing a wealth of seismic, geodetic, and chemical data for academic volcanologists and monitoring agencies. We have better insights into volcanic systems thanks to steady improvements in research tools and data processing techniques. The integration of these data into physics-based models allows us for example to constrain magma migration at depth and to derive the pressure evolution inside volcanic conduits and reservoirs, which ultimately help monitor evolving volcanic hazard. Yet, it remains challenging to answer the most crucial questions when the threat of an eruption looms over us: When will it occur? What will be its style? Will it switch during its course? How long will the eruption last? And most importantly: will we have enough time to alert and evacuate population? Addressing these questions is crucial to reduce the social and economic impact of volcanic eruptions, both at the local and global scales. For example, the 2014 eruption at Ontake (Japan) had only limited spatial impact but killed dozens of hikers; in contrast, the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption (Iceland) did not cause any human loss but paralyzed the European air space for weeks. Several limitations arise when approaching these questions. For example, short-term eruption forecasts and models that relate changes in monitoring parameters to the probability, timing, and nature of future activity are particularly uncertain. More reliable and useful quantitative forecasting requires the development of optimized and integrated monitoring networks, standardized approaches and nomenclature, and a new range of statistical methods and models that better capture the complexity of volcanic processes and system dynamics.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::P Mathematics & science::PD Science: general issues
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::R Earth sciences, geography, environment, planning::RG Geography::RGB Physical geography & topography
dc.subject.othervolcanology
dc.subject.othermonitoring
dc.subject.otherforecasting
dc.subject.otherearth science
dc.subject.othervolcano
dc.titleTowards Improved Forecasting of Volcanic Eruptions
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3389/978-2-88963-624-2
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf5ce210-e72e-4860-ba9b-c305640ff3ae
oapen.relation.isbn9782889636242
oapen.pages317


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/