Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorFinder, Stuart G.
dc.contributor.editorBliton, Mark J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T14:19:24Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T14:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier1007225
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22936
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34678
dc.description.abstractThis open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally “professionalize” the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of “peer-reviews”: critique of the actions of the case scenario’s ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::H Humanities::HP Philosophy::HPQ Ethics & moral philosophy
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::M Medicine::MB Medicine: general issues::MBP Health systems & services::MBPM Medical administration & management
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy
dc.subject.otherEthics
dc.subject.otherHealth administration
dc.titlePeer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy9fa3421d-f917-4153-b9ab-fc337c396b5a
oapen.pages228
oapen.place.publicationCham
dc.dateSubmitted2020-03-18 13:36:15
dc.dateSubmitted2020-04-01T08:57:00Z


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access