Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Amelsvoort, Jesse
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-13T04:01:05Z
dc.date.available2023-10-13T04:01:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-10-12T13:13:54Z
dc.identifierONIX_20231012_9789048560110_7
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/76681
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/117554
dc.description.abstractFramed against Timothy Clark’s comments on the potency of ecocriticism, in this contribution I first zoom in on how cultural critique according to Rosemarie Buikema can contribute to discussions on matters of common concern. I then sketch two lines of argument that emerge from her work: firstly, the way in which art and culture can break through societal silences and, secondly, the importance of history and the past for cultural production in the present. Both issues are important where it concerns climate change and the Anthropocene. They lead to the essential question when thinking about ecocriticism: not ‘where goes cultural critique’ (the ‘quo vadis’ question), but what kind of critique is necessary?
dc.languageDutch
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherenvironmental humanities
dc.subject.otherecocriticism
dc.subject.othercultural critique
dc.subject.otherrepresentation
dc.subject.otherRosemarie Buikema
dc.titleChapter Cultuurkritiek in het antropoceen
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.5117/9789048560110_amelsvoort
oapen.relation.isPublishedByde2ecbe7-1037-4e96-8c3a-5a842d921e04
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookTransities in kunst, cultuur en politiek = Transitions in Art, Culture, and Politics
oapen.relation.isFundedByb586072e-2e5d-469f-8332-217c0beb5b08
oapen.relation.isFundedBy4d864437-7722-4c66-b80f-140a98d4bca9
oapen.relation.isbn9789048560110
oapen.relation.isbn9789048560127
oapen.pages9
oapen.place.publicationAmsterdam
oapen.grant.number[...]
oapen.grant.number[...]
dc.relationisFundedByb586072e-2e5d-469f-8332-217c0beb5b08
dc.relationisFundedBy4d864437-7722-4c66-b80f-140a98d4bca9
dc.abstractotherlanguageFramed against Timothy Clark’s comments on the potency of ecocriticism, in this contribution I first zoom in on how cultural critique according to Rosemarie Buikema can contribute to discussions on matters of common concern. I then sketch two lines of argument that emerge from her work: firstly, the way in which art and culture can break through societal silences and, secondly, the importance of history and the past for cultural production in the present. Both issues are important where it concerns climate change and the Anthropocene. They lead to the essential question when thinking about ecocriticism: not ‘where goes cultural critique’ (the ‘quo vadis’ question), but what kind of critique is necessary?


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access